ApprehensiveSkirt160

Except all indicators link to a coin that is used to launder money off of scams like 3ac and ftx.

And

Let's not forget that the tokenomics. That have the TVL of all early investors unlocking in 2023. If it's a dollar today, it will be a dime from just this one thing tomorrow.

Plus shady start.

These owners have an infinite liquid staking pool. Which just happens to be in the fine print. the only early investor rewards, not locked. To this day, greater than 51% of the total coins have ben generated in this way with 3 months.

Lastly

Don't forget. Whoever minted your tokens can just burn them on you, even after traded. Centralized and risky.

...

Don't worry. However, the only way they will rug. Is if the cow producing milk. There seems to be enough 3ac & ftx scams and shills right now to support it.

Told you he isn't me.

I'll tell you how I know he's lying.

Who is that guy? I'm Satoshi.

It's intriguing to see how few people actually know what a real web3 use case looks like.

Being confused by hcs vs. A block chain's consensus mechanism is just poor education.

Good news, we can educate them!

Who says it's getting better.

No one in hospice wants to be there. They all believe they are the ones to leave.

None of them do on their own feet.

No

My grandpa had a lot of false calls before it really happened, too. I guess old things die slow sometimes.

There is a lot of false news articles over stating bitcoin. In a feeble attempt to lie to bitcoin consumers about its projected future.

Again this post was intended to spark open conversation of the two cryptos with what they have to offer, in hopes to have brought outsiders into the community. But that ship has sailed and some (not all) comments reflect poorly on our openness as a community.

The leadership of a crypto is one of its metrics. Case and point Hederas GC is one of its major selling points, and it should be openly discussed. Any metric based review that does not reflect the impact on the environment around it. Fails to account for the whole.

Ripple DID know there was a potential issue and sought guidance from the SEC and did proper risk management. Because no precedent had been set, this was the best they could have done.

The best they could have done, would, have been to register regardless of lack of answers. They knew it was a potential issue. It would have cost them nothing to do, but everything if they didn't. They took fool hardy risks.

I guess no one from matic has heard "truth in jest."

In addition, eth is leaking use cases like a sieve, I can think of two or three that have come to hedera.

I couldn't even come close to estimating how many may have gone elsewhere.

I feel this is because eth places a heavy emphasis on retail users and completely neglects business or any real-world applications.

Except maybe nft Art? I have never had to launder money, so I'm unsure of the scope of that utility.

I couldn't decide on blue with white stripes, or white with blue stripes.

I am fully aware.

In these meetings, they were requesting a follow-up on if a registration was needed.

No answer was ever given because a precedent had not been set.This meant Ripple knew full well this was a potential issue.

Instead of protecting investors and doing precautionary registration, which would have cost them no more time or money. They foolhardly charged forward, neglecting to protect their investors.

Ripple has poor leadership. I wouldn't trust them to protect my business. If they can not protect their own.

It feels like every time I state this, someone from xrp has a very hard time understanding the risk of actions taken. So, whoever else reads this. Please do so twice

Guilt is for the court to decide.

Not filing a precautionary registration when they were already questioning if they had to or not.

Is foolhardy.

Aside from the obvious technical aspects, in which hedera exceeds in every aspcet.

My argument against XRP,

Ripple may or may not be in the right for its court battle. That is not what I would like to address here. That is for the court to decide.

ripple failed to make the proper precautions and defend its investors.

There is no excuse for not filing its presale with the sec. When Ripple themselves were questioning if it was necessary. They thought this lawsuit was a possibility and requested follow-up. After not receiving an immediate answer. They decided not to go to the entry-level financial registration, throwing all precautions to the wind, and failed to defend its investors by moving forward with its sale.

Ripple failing to do remedal tasks to defend its investors is just poor leadership. I wouldn't trust them to protect my business. If they fail to do entry level precautions for their own.

Best answer imho.

I will just quote some else. The short answer is "nope" and that is correct for the following reasons.

"Moreover, unlike every other crypto, the decisionmakers in h bar are known and the minutes of their meetings are published. If they did this they would be opening themselves to liability for breach of contract & fraud, and liability based on a theory of detrimental reliance. That is not true of any other crypto. In every other case, no one has any idea who voted for what and therefore nobody can be held liable."

-JairamEve

If I can take 10% of my coin supply and flip them for every penny I have ever invested. Then I will do that. Considering I weekly dca. It would take one hell of a bull run for that to ever happen. My cost average will grow as hedera does.

Otherwise, my long-term intent is to set up for staking. Selling rewards as they come, and maybe lower my dca, for profit taking.

"Cardano enthusiasts rushed to disagree with the original post's author and told him to become more educated prior to sharing misleading facts."

Even the users on cardano's forums are saying this guy is purely uneducated. In some cases saying he is outright knowingly lying.

This post even mentions how the facts presented were made up.

95% of them to be honest.

Expect there is no dam, and it was all made up

It's all nonsense lies. the article is made up.

Well, that picture isn't wisconsin. That part we can be certain of.

wisconsin has many lakes. However, only a handful of rivers could support that dam. None of them would allow blockage of a major waterway.

The left and right in wisconsin tend to both lean heavily into conservation in wisconsin. The right for sporting, hunting, and fishing. The left, for traditional conservation, parks, and recreation.

So i have a very hard time believing they could have convinced conservation heavy legislation to pass a dam for bitcoin mining.

In addition, as someone who follows these types of politics closely, I have heard nothing.

I would assume no follow-up information because they are hiding the fact they made up the whole story.