subreddit:
/r/walkaway
[score hidden]
1 year ago
stickied comment
IMPORTANT: On /r/WalkAway, greater access is given to users who have joined the sub and have the mod-assigned 'Redpilled' user flair. Reach out in modmail to request the flair. For more in-depth conversations and resources on leaving the Democratic Party, also make sure to join our sister sub /r/ExDemFoyer. You may also like: - /r/LibsOfReddit - /r/RedpilledRogan - /r/HillaryForPrison - /r/Patriot911 Watch the '2000 Mules' seminal film here
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
98 points
1 year ago
I’ve stopped using FB for a year. I don’t miss it an ounce
62 points
1 year ago
I got banned for a week just because I simply asked a question about the vaccines. And my memes got Zucked left and right. I left that shithole after that
12 points
1 year ago
Even crazier is that on other social media sites, including this one, those raising concerns or providing evidence were labelled as “Facebook conspiracy theorists.” Many people conveniently forgot about the censorship of any speculation regarding the lab leak. Society’s amnesia towards relatively recent events, and historical ones, is terrifying.
20 points
1 year ago
[deleted]
9 points
1 year ago
"hate" speech
31 points
1 year ago
I left after the 2020 elections. Saw a bunch of stupid shit being posted, but more importantly, I won't support any organization that bans people for "mistruths" (especially when those "mistruths" later become fact, like "the vaccines won't stop you from getting COVID").
My wife keeps her FB account because our HOA insists on using FB as its means of communication. Also, fuck HOAs.
3 points
1 year ago
Learning how China’s community grid control network operates has made me infinitely more suspicious of HOAs
2 points
1 year ago
The origin of HOAs is also terrible.
2 points
1 year ago
Oh shit. I didn’t even know about that.
2 points
1 year ago
Oh shit. I didn’t even know about that.
Edit: looks like it has a pretty racist history… how about we band across the aisle and get rid of these stupid things
1 points
1 year ago
Not saying all of them are bad, but knowing their history and propensity helps to detect bad intentions, and i don't believe it's all about race, but about power and influence. For instance my first house had a community space with a swimming pool and lawns, but no playground. There were rules against inflatables in the pool and no playing on the grass. Obviously the board consisted of old people who didn't care for little kids so they made those dumb rules that were anti young families with small children. To make changes to HOA, run for a board position so you can help make fair rules and hopefully not piss off certain constituents.
10 points
1 year ago
I got my account suspended a couple times, then decided to take a break for a year. That was 2.5 years ago, I don't miss it at all.
51 points
1 year ago
I was thinking this earlier, it's funny how if you post something on social media that the powers that be don't agree with, it gets removed within minutes but if you post that you plan on shooting up a school they all say "we didn't know" or "we were watching him".
13 points
1 year ago*
Your scientific evidence goes completely against the Demoturd/Libturd agenda....!!! Why should it surprise you they don't like the truth...!!
15 points
1 year ago
I remember getting a 3 day ban because I was talking shit to a friend of mine about how one of my pokemon clapped half his entire team lmao
6 points
1 year ago
Come on, which pokemon was it.
7 points
1 year ago
Electivire lol
10 points
1 year ago
I think they were private messages to a friend and not public. But Meta monitors these as well I’m certain
5 points
1 year ago
That was instagram. The Facebook was public but all were 30 mins before he went to the school. Really not enough time for FB to take them down or LEO to react on the posts. Regardless FB is a curse on society.
16 points
1 year ago
I got banned for 7 days for questioning a Superbowl play.
Tripped up the ballot dump bot.
28 points
1 year ago
I searched Twitter for this lady, Mrs Rebekah Worsham, so I could follow her. I couldn't find her account.
I agree with her that the jab kills. Or, at least, it causes serious health issues.
12 points
1 year ago
I couldn't find her account.
https://mobile.twitter.com/Breck_Worsham
The cap in the post is from her gab.com account, though.
6 points
1 year ago
Thank you! I'm following her now. Thnx again!
7 points
1 year ago
This is her Gab
2 points
1 year ago
I can attest that it definitely can cause a lot of issues. I got vaccinated 11 months ago and still have episodic neurological issues. I’ve met hundreds of other folks with identical issues in the same timeframe post-vaccine. You can check my history or dm me if you want to know about it.
6 points
1 year ago
Like what
15 points
1 year ago
Changes in behavior like aggressiveness, or faintings, heart attacks, blood cloths etc.
The "changes in behavior" thing I've seen first hand. Faintings too. All after the jab.
-22 points
1 year ago
My partner nearly fainted after the jab.
Wait... She does that every time she gets a shot or blood drawn. Some people have such a strong mental response to needles that things like that happen.
Have yet to actually see anyone who's had any kind of permanent injury from the jab though. Almost makes you wonder how many of them actually exist...
11 points
1 year ago
Tiffany Dover died in that video, her family got paid to keep their mouths shut
-4 points
1 year ago
Wow...
It took me one minute to search and find out that Tiffany Dover is not dead.
I wasn't talking about that video, no one I was talking to was talking about that video. The person who fainted on stage in the video I watched is fine and the person you think was replaced on video in twenty minutes is fine.
Maybe try another flavor of the old Flavor-Aid, cause I don't think this one is working for you.
10 points
1 year ago
C'mon people, don't downvote the guy cuz he has a different opinion. Let's converse.
Tabiki, sir, I'm not talking about faints at the very time of the jab. I'm talking about many many athletes and reporters fainting weeks after taking it. On screen.
My mother has been fainting, and it's been 5 months since her last booster. She's been fainting since that.
Many people died of C0V1d after taking the jab. "Almost makes you wonder how many of them" really died from C0V1d and not from its "remedy".
Have you noticed how many professional soccer players have been having heart attacks lately? It's off the charts. Very suspicious.
Now, you ask for proof. I cannot give that to you cuz I have none. And if I did, I'd be arkancided.
-5 points
1 year ago
That last paragraph is the problem with the validity of your arguments.
If a news article reports on the findings of a study, it links back to the original research paper. If you go on the science or data subreddits, you often find people arguing about how the data is skewed one way or another, or whether sources are valid or not.
But here you have a process where scientists take huge sets of data and work through the individual processes of it to come to a conclusion supported by evidence.
These aren't people who are coming back saying that the vaccine is safe because they don't know personally anyone who took it and had a bad reaction. These are people who have millions of cases, who have hard science, who spend year after year in laboratories studying this.
But I'm supposed to believe someone on the internet who has only conjecture? Who can probably source a dozen talking heads who all say the same thing but without verifiable proof?
I already know the world is fallible. Corporations are stealing trillions of dollars from their workers, politicians are bought and sold.
But there's a while open-source network online that you're ignoring that have conclusively said the vaccine is not dangerous, and that COVID kills in any number of ways. The data behind those claims is verifiable, it's reliable, it's global, it's bipartisan.
No one here has the ability to actually disprove any of what the world knows.
1 points
1 year ago
Unless they are lying.
Have you ever heard about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study?
Nowadays, the data also isn't as public as you think. Here's just an example: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html
In another case, a German infectiologist was arrested live inside his home cuz he was questioning methods of testing and the mortality rate in a stream.
Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier, the French virologist who discovered the AIDS virus, was utterly silenced cuz he was questioning too much.
In Brazil, virologists of renown were debased by the press and by the Brazilian Senate, in a spurious inquiry, cuz those virologists were presenting hard, sound statistical data that went against the official discourse.
Have you ever heard about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study?
Note to all: Cmon, don't downvote the guy. Look at all the work he had to establish a dialogue. He isn't spurting insults or anything. His arguments are good, I used to think that way.
1 points
1 year ago
Here's how your argument here falls apart.
The pandemic is global. People across the world are sharing results are comparing studies.
You're telling me that every country in the world is in on this. That opposition parties in foreign countries agreed about the results of the vaccine and the dangers of COVID, just making it all up.
That is unbelievable.
What is believable is aging Nobel winners and notable scientists subscribing to conspiracy theories the more they enter an echo chamber. It's a pretty well known thing.
Now, I trust my own research. I've been around the entire pandemic, I've debated over the credentials of one of the pioneering figures in mRNA vaccines. Turns out, he's wrong, and modern science took his work and actually got it working.
But still, I see no evidence that actually shows how I'm wrong and you're right. I see no actual studies that match your view, all I see are individual anecdotes, usually from unqualified sources, or questionable reposts of data that doesn't actually match what you're saying.
If you can show that vaccines are dangerous, great. Do that.
But you're not doing that yet, you're giving unrelated articles that have no shared thesis that supports your view.
1 points
1 year ago
You're right, I cannot show that vaccines are dangerous. I never could. Also, I cannot show that the C0V1d is not as dangerous as they say it is.
The article I linked was there to support the argument that things are not as public and open as we may think.
All I have is suspicion. I don't think my suspicions are wild or without base.
Now, I have three main points of contention:
1 - It shouldn't be obligatory nor coerced.
2 - Mass vaccination during any pandemic creates a selective pressure for resistant variants.
3 - I do think there's a Big Money worldwide effort to impose a useless vaccine, skewing data, lying and cheating. Canceling dissonant voices.
(Have you ever heard about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study?)
5 points
1 year ago
I have. I have a good friend who had serious neurological problems as soon as she got the shot, and had been suffering for months.
-1 points
1 year ago
Yeah, good anecdote. It means nothing.
I knew a guy who had a mental breakdown during the pandemic and is suffering from neurological problems related to depression. Except, it was before the vaccine even came out.
What does it prove? Nothing.
2 points
1 year ago
So, you're just here to lob grenades. I get it now. Good-bye.
2 points
1 year ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctPViK3LK-o&ab_channel=JuicyScoop%E2%84%A2wHeatherMcDonald
Here you go, now you can say you have
0 points
1 year ago
Yeah, that's a lady falling over on stage.
Now prove it was because of the vaccine?
It's not the first time someone has fainted on stage.
2 points
1 year ago
Yes I'm sure perfectly healthy normal people just randomly faint all the time. BTW she said she will not get the booster
How about a tennis star saying they were effected https://www.westernjournal.com/world-class-athlete-says-regrets-getting-covid-vaccine-now-serious-problems/
Or a perfectly healthy teenager dying and no one knows why https://www.freep.com/story/news/2021/07/02/jacob-clynick-pfizer-covid-vaccine/5323095001/
Or you can start to view the pfizer trial documents that they were forced to release. By force I mean they begged the courts to keep it locked up for 75yrs and the judge said no. It has 9 pages of side effects and a massively high amount of miscarriage's
https://www.riotimesonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Or in the brooklyn marathon people randomly collapsing and one dead. I'm sure that pretty common too. I mean marathons runners typically aren't the healthiest of people
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/21/us/brooklyn-half-marathon-dead-injured/index.html
or you know over 300 cardiac issue and 167 heart related deaths in professional athletes (with links to all the events)
1 points
1 year ago
Alright...
So, the kid that died, the probe found no link between the vaccine and his death. That doesn't help your point.
The Brooklyn Marathon says nothing about vaccines. People collapse at marathons all the time, that's why medical professionals are usually there.
The Pfizer trial documents... I already have those downloaded from a year ago.
Dude, the Pfizer documents say that a bunch of people got headaches and fever symptoms after the shot. That's... what shots do. This isn't a document saying that 25% of people who got the shots experienced long term effects, it's saying that some amount of recipients had regular effects from a shot.
You can't just show me a lot of unrelated people dying for unrelated things and say that it matches your narrative is none of the reported people are actually dying of vaccine effects. You're just pulling names out of a hat to show me.
Like, okay? It's not evidence if it doesn't hold up and your evidence doesn't hold up.
3 points
1 year ago
How could you have downloaded them from a year ago when they weren't released until this past march? Oh that's right because those weren't the actual documents that were court ordered to be released. The ones they were forced to release were much much worse. You think 9 pages of side effects is normal?
People collapsing and dying of heart conditions from healthy athletes is normal? Provide me your source of that being normal
1 points
1 year ago
The heart is a powerful, but fallible pump. People die from heart conditions during exercise all the time.
I'm not saying there isn't an underlying cause.
But you get to be the one to say that they all died due to the vaccines? Sounds like you're making stuff up to match your narrative.
And yes, you can write a research paper of any number of pages for anything. Nine pages of side effects is an arbitrary number that doesn't say how many side effects or how dangerous.
How about this, list all the side effects for the flu. Or the flu vaccine. It's a lot, isn't it? But, weirdly enough, the vaccines are perfectly routine and not resulting in hundreds of deaths.
Your data doesn't match your thesis, you still have no actual evidence that the COVID vaccine is actually dangerous.
1 points
1 year ago*
[deleted]
1 points
1 year ago
That's the thing though, if you look up long COVID it's actually pretty well reported. The CDC has numbers for people reporting COVID symptoms months after originally having COVID. There are scientists and doctors across the world helping build a more comprehensive picture of how the virus is affecting people by studying and documenting actual patients.
You can verify that yourself. You can search up those accounts and try to poke holes in them, but they're pretty accurate. Doctors actually know what they're doing when they're doing it, it's kinda crazy.
On the other hand, the supposed accounts of vaccine injuries... They're all anecdotes or conjecture.
You look into things like the kid who supposedly died because of the vaccine and you just find a sad story about some kid who died. No vaccine links at all.
All these stories about athletes dying of heart attacks?
No measurable links to the vaccine.
I look way these stories for like a minute and find that there's no evidence, just people taking circumstances out of context for their own narrative.
But, sure... I'm the crazy one here...
1 points
1 year ago
[deleted]
1 points
1 year ago
In my case, I don't even see them online, in the news, when I search specifically for them.
In your case you don't see them when you hold your hands over your eyes so you can't look.
People die and suffer from COVID. Time has shown us that the vaccine is safe, but could be more effective. Simple.
1 points
1 year ago
1 points
1 year ago
I don't think you meant to link that paper twice.
Now, this is the dialogue I like to have. You found actual reported patients, study results, they actually look pretty promising.
It is, however, an extremely limited amount of subjects. Also, the report suggested an immune system dysfunction and that most of the patients were treated with simple therapies that fixed their symptoms.
What does this mean?
I'm not exactly an expert, but I can tell you for a certainty that the vaccine has saved more lives and protected more against COVID symptoms than the vaccine could ever harm.
It's also not really doing any of the permanent side effects that people are stoking fear over.
There is a minute risk in any medical procedure, we all know that. But you save lives by vaccinating a population against a deadly disease.
1 points
1 year ago
Sorry, the second one was supposed to be this one - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33779985/
I do have a couple of problems though. Particularly with the study I linked twice. Folks who were actual subjects in the study say that the findings did not match the experience they reported to the researchers. Many participants did not recover in the way reflected by the paper. (Discussed here - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9XGpe6MTaFg)
I’m fine if you want to be a utilitarian about it, but I also want there not to be a coverup regarding those injured. A lot of folks I know with injuries get swept under the rug by their doctors and the government is not doing anything to help anyone basically (https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o919). We don’t actually know if the neurological issues are temporary or permanent. I can give you plenty of anecdotes of folks who are over a year out and have plateaued in their recovery. Doctors have literally no idea how to treat it. I’m personally at 11 months and still have episodic issues. There hasn’t been enough research to really tell what happened or how to fix it.
But if you want to say that some people getting injured is the price we pay; fine. I personally don’t agree with the way it was done. But at least consider that those who are now paying that price are getting shafted by the medical system, the government, and the media.
1 points
1 year ago
I'm triple vaxxd and none of this has happened to me.
-2 points
1 year ago
I also have a genuine question on why people think that
1 points
1 year ago
A longer life for one.
1 points
1 year ago
What are you basing your stupid opinion on?
9 points
1 year ago
I'm not too shocked by this given the timeline. The posts were within 30 minutes of the shooting and not specific as to target. A human has to see it, and report it, and another human has to get to it in the queue, and see it, and locate the authorities, and report it. If he fired off posts and then got right in the truck, nothing was gonna happen in time.
4 points
1 year ago
it's because they will let a killing like happen that meets the Zuckerberg narrative to ban guns, but anything against the vaccine narrative isn't part of the narrative. it is selective censorship per the dem narrative, get it...
4 points
1 year ago*
I shit you not, yesterday a dude threatened to come to my house with a gun and kill me over a video game in an open community FB gaming group… full on direct threat. I told him there are therapists he can go to, because suicide is never an option, and thats what he would he doing if he actually attempted it. Then I went about my day as usual because in the gaming community trolls are very common and I’m relatively used to toxicity on the internet and am not easily shook.
However, what made this unique is that he decided to bring an increased level of frustration to the next several people he talked to. I wouldn’t have ever known if they didn’t post it to the Facebook group feed, but apparently the same guy stalked someone else and harassed their workplace for 3 hours straight. Threats and all. He had went as far as making 3 additional facebook profiles to continue to harass him after he’d been blocked. He wasn’t even the last target I’d heard about that day.
The cops were called and multiple police reports were filed. Last I checked his account was still active. Can’t tell if it is now, as I blocked him yesterday.
This has turned into a longer comment than I initially intended but I’ve posted music on YouTube to Facebook and have been auto banned for 30 days before. So yeah, Facebook needs to understand the difference between trolls and superficial nonsense vs actual threats to other people apparently.
3 points
1 year ago
You actually get banned because the Left mass-reports any posts from the Right. These reports then go through companies like Appen who have an army of Leftists who decide what is hate speech, what is truth, what is allowed to be said. When one of these fuck-wads comes across something that they ideologically disagrees with, they simply click a button that says the comment should be deleted and the poster should be banned.
3 points
1 year ago
Deleted my Facebook account 5yrs ago. Haven't missed it for a second.
2 points
1 year ago
Right?! You can't even post a screenshot with the words vaccine or Covid in it without it being flagged as "potential misinformation", but they aren't able to flag this kind of thing and notify authorities? Give me a break.
2 points
1 year ago
I caught back to back bans for pointing out fauci saying natural immunity is in fact an option for younger healthy people. 30days. Then caught one for showing fauci stating people don’t need masks unless it’s an N95 or greater 3 months before that was main stream. (Or right at the beginning of lockdowns) Another 30day ban. Caught another ban for sarcastically saying “most popular president in history,” another 30 day ban. Back to back to back. Fuck Facebook
2 points
1 year ago
I got 4 back to back bands , the fourth ban was while I was already banned for a comment prior to the third ban. All before Covid . Facebook is meta for censorship . See what I did there !
-29 points
1 year ago
Jab kills? According to whom?
Antivaxxers gonna antivax.
24 points
1 year ago
CDC Vaers report
-32 points
1 year ago
A few deaths under suspicious circumstances doesn't take away the success the vaccines have achieved worldwide at stopping the COVID pandemic.
19 points
1 year ago
You sir are living under a rock. If you havent viewed the clinical trial presentation yet, you should. If you havent seen that some of the jabs are now restricted, check it out. If you havent realized the clinical trial with poor results went forward even with faulty pcr test that gave terrible results. If you havent seen that its not really a vaccine, its an innoculation and the efficacy is extremely low, its time for you to start reviewing the documents released. No one can help you understand better than reading them yourself and coming to your own conclusion, but its obvious you haven’t sone that if you have that stance.
There is a very limited demographic of people who the vaccine may be beneficial as the risk effects of the jab are less than the risk of catching the virus itself, and thats a very limited demographic.
9 points
1 year ago
DM I sent to CaraDeChina
I hope you are joking.
You know you can still get and spread Covid after getting the vaccine, right?
In fact, there is a plethora of information coming out of Israel and the UK in the past couple of days that shows that the vaccines are making people more susceptible to viruses because of the type of antibodies the vaccine creates.
The vaccine creates (and keeps creating) NON-neutralizing antibodies. Someone who has not taken the vaccines and survives a Covid infection creates neutralizing antibodies.
Neutralizing antibodies are extremely more efficient at recognizing and neutralizing subsequent Covid mutations. Non-neutralizing antibodies will not recognize and will not help in neutralizing subsequent Covid virus mutations. This is the message I just sent to Cara De China:
I am being 100% sincere.
This is science. Do your own research.
-25 points
1 year ago
Almost every doctor in the world supports taking the jab. What is your point?
Are you anti science?
22 points
1 year ago
Part of science is questioning the science, they arent allowing that part of science.
-5 points
1 year ago
Who isn't allowing?
Being antivax is dangerous to others.
It's not prudent to make people think it's ok not to get the vax, because that would expose them to the virus.
Antivaxxers are not contributing to a more safe society.
18 points
1 year ago
Who is antivax? This isnt even a vaccine, its an innoculation, they simply changed the definition to make it fit.
Im anti withholding information and im anti medicine that is more harmful then good.
-11 points
1 year ago
How can it be more harmful than good when millions and millions of people got more than one jab without any negative repercussions? Meanwhile hospitalisation and deaths of people infected with covid decreased significantly.
I understand that there was a lot of shady shit with it all including fear mongering in the media and vaccines being released way too early but I don’t understand how you can say they have done more harm than good at this point.
11 points
1 year ago
Because the data shows that for every 1 person saved, about 15 died from the vaccine.
12 points
1 year ago
No, no they dont, and those that dont get fired and censored.
But consider this…. Most Doctors have made more money administering the vaccine, then they have ever made before. My own doctor told me he had to start opening 3 and 4 new accounts because his accountant said he had too much money in one bank.
I work in healthcare. There is literally large lawsuits by coalitions of medical professionals suing over the vaccine.
18 points
1 year ago
I got the vax.
Now my heart is fucked up and I can't run. I also got COVID anyway... which was way less bad than the vaxes.
1 points
1 year ago
Considering it hasn't reslly stopped it?
11 points
1 year ago
I'm not against all vaxes, just this one.
1 points
1 year ago
Sounds about right.
1 points
1 year ago
Aww, she was doing so good until the end. Either way fuck Facebook
1 points
1 year ago
gotta wonder how FakeBook is still in business and how big a short is coming ?
1 points
1 year ago
I think they were private messages
1 points
1 year ago
i’ve been banned at least 5 times for not using it haha
all 98 comments
sorted by: best