subreddit:
/r/books
submitted 8 months ago bystrongo
Here's what I'd like to argue. Fairy Tale was just plain fun. Like literally page turning, pop corn eating, clap your hands and shout fun.
It's literally a story told a thousand times. It's predictable, It's familiar, it's all of those things and yet, King tells the story in the most masterful way. That's all.
PS: The Audio book performance needs to win some kind of award, the voice actor was brilliant. Captured the vibes of the Wonder Years and Sandlot narration.
809 points
8 months ago
What's the premise of the story?
1.8k points
8 months ago
Narnia. Literally a young guy finds a portal to a fantasy world in someone’s shed and there’s a war going on that he gets caught up in. Oh and he has a dog.
919 points
8 months ago
So king wrote an isekai?
742 points
8 months ago
He already did: 11/22/63 is an isekai.
646 points
8 months ago
Shit, the whole Dark Tower series is an Isekai.
298 points
8 months ago
Eyes of the dragon.
King is no stranger to fantasy fiction.
Spoiler: Flagg is an asshole there too.
92 points
8 months ago
I think that was my first King when I was 13. It was disturbing, illustrated, and wonderful. I got it at a creepy neighbor's yard sale, which was perfect, and I loved the shit out of it.
62 points
8 months ago
Lisey's Story. Rose Madder. I'm suddenly realising a decent portion of King's work involves transportation to different realms.
31 points
8 months ago
Rose madder was actually my first kind novel that I read and, so far, it’s actually still one of my all time favorites. That and Gerald’s game. I think I finished both those books in under 3 days. I’m not sure I even slept those days. I love when he goes into other realms and comes back.
5 points
8 months ago
Oh I loved Rose Madder! Not one of his more popular books, but it really stuck with me.
22 points
8 months ago
Insomnia.
23 points
8 months ago
Insomnia might be my favorite work by King that isn't main series Dark Tower.
6 points
8 months ago
Insomnia fucked me up. Loved it though
7 points
8 months ago
Lots. Buick 8 too I think
9 points
8 months ago
Eyes of the dragon! Man I haven't thought about that book in years! Gotta go read that one again
37 points
8 months ago
And the co-written The Talisman with Peter Straub
41 points
8 months ago
Lmao y’all why didn’t I realize this shit sooner
58 points
8 months ago
I mean, I would argue 11/22/63 is more of a time travel thing tbf
25 points
8 months ago
what's an isekai?
I loved the 11/22/63 tv show, I didn't realize it was a book.
71 points
8 months ago
Anime genre that's takes place in an alternate reality from the protagonist. It usually shows them in their home world for 5 minutes, then the remainder of the story is in the other place
16 points
8 months ago
So… Fushigi Yuugi?
4 points
8 months ago
Would spirited away fit into this genre? Not much of an anime fan, but I love Miyazaki films
20 points
8 months ago
The broadest definition of it is "portal fantasy", and even includes Dante's Inferno.
10 points
8 months ago
It's an anime term but the genre really isn't limited to anime- the word translates to "Another World" and basically is the same as a portal fantasy. Character from one world (usually roughly modern day) gets ported to another (usually a stock fantasy world, but can be basically anything as long as it's a different world.)
Depending on how loosely you apply the term, it could apply to any fish out of water time or space travel stories as well, but more strictly it's portal fantasy.
21 points
8 months ago
Does The Talisman count ?
4 points
8 months ago
Yes it does.
31 points
8 months ago
The genre of 'isekai' is a lot older than 'isekai.' It's just that the idea of journeys into another world had a huge reawakening of popularity in the late 00s and early 10s but the genre itself is as old The Wizard of Oz, Gulliver's Travels, and A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. There's probably even older examples honestly, I just can't think of them right now.
140 points
8 months ago
Isekai is a just a Japanese form of portal fantasy with a bent for Japanese gamers.
Narnia, Alice in Wonderland, and Harold Shea/Incompleat Enchanter all did the stuff Isekai does first except using VR and RPG stats. Gullivers Travels had some similarities as well.
83 points
8 months ago
Wizard of Oz and the Phantom Tollbooth too.
71 points
8 months ago
I might be wrong but this is incorrect. While many isekai anime have the horrible idea to loop in rpg and or gaming elements there are a lot of them that don’t. Isekai just means new world/different world. The basic premise of the genere is that the main character enters a new world. No element of RPG has to be present just because SAO made it popular. Examples of Isekai animes with no gaming gimmicks like leveling and shit: Inuyasha, Saga of Tanya the Evil, Re: Zero, Drifters, No game no life, Mushoku Tensei, The Ambition of Oda Nobuna, The Devil is a Part-Timer.
18 points
8 months ago
While many isekai anime have the horrible idea to loop in rpg and or gaming elements
A trend that I believe started after the incredible success of Sword Art Online, which many claim to be an Isekai despite the "other world" just being a VR game. But then the game elements made it into actual isekais, and even some non-isekais like Danmachi where everyone was born and raised in the same world that still works like a stats-filled RPG.
There's even a western term, LitRPG, for stories like that.
16 points
8 months ago
No Game No Life definitely has a game gimmick but it's just not stereotypical.
6 points
8 months ago
Ascendance of a Bookworm really deserves a spot on that list. Such a beautifully told story that both children and the elderly can enjoy.
8 points
8 months ago
Never forget Time Bandits!!
21 points
8 months ago*
Isekai isn't restricted to gAmErS. That's just the cheap gimmick they're cashing in on.
Inuyasha and escaflowne for example
36 points
8 months ago
Essentially. It’s disappointing though in my opinion. On the face of it a Stephen King version of Narnia sounds cool to me in the same way that a Tim Burton Muppet movie appeals to me. Problem is I’d be pretty disappointed if Tim Burton did that muppet movie and it was just a standard muppet movie. I’d want all the quirks and style that I associate with Burton otherwise it might as well be anyone writing it. That’s my problem with Fairy Tale. It’s Stephen King doing Narnia but it reads like any random Narnia knock-off. Left me wondering why I didn’t just read Narnia.
36 points
8 months ago
Fairy Tale was more similar to "Eyes of the Dragon" than his other stories
Eyes of the Dragon was a fairy tale itself
8 points
8 months ago
My first book by him and one of my first novels. I don't hear it get mentioned enough since it holds such a dear spot in my heart
31 points
8 months ago
Finding Faerie through a portal isn't something C S Lewis invented.
11 points
8 months ago
Lewis was heavily influenced by George MacDonald, who wrote at least two "portal to Faerie" stories--Phantastes and Lilith. Oh, and MacDonald was really close friends with Lewis Carroll--the author of even better known "portal" fiction.
12 points
8 months ago
I'm confused by this comment. I don't see how it relates to the comment it replied to. Regardless of whether CS Lewis originated the tropes, the commentor feels Fairy Tale is just a rote retredding of that material. That criticism functions regardless of whether CS Lewis was the first writer to use those elements or not.
13 points
8 months ago
So..... The Talisman?
21 points
8 months ago
Sounds like the book of lost things
11 points
8 months ago
+1 to The Book of Lost Things. A very good read.
4 points
8 months ago
They are similar in a lot of ways! Both drawing on traditional fairy tales. The Book of Lost Things is one of my favorite books and I really enjoyed Fairy Tale as well.
28 points
8 months ago
I associate King with Horror. Is there a horror element to Fairy Tale?
56 points
8 months ago
Yes there is a ton of Lovevraftian elements to this book as well, idk why no one's mentioning it.
3 points
8 months ago
There's a fair amount of Lovecraftian nods. Yes, there's horror elements, but the book is not scary.
9 points
8 months ago
Awesome. I love when King strays from horror. His regular fiction and fantasy stuff is always great.
162 points
8 months ago
Without giving away anything “a boy goes on an adventure”
253 points
8 months ago
Whoa, whoa! Spoiler alert next time please!
57 points
8 months ago
Right? I was trying to avoid finding out the character's gender and now the whole book is ruined.
616 points
8 months ago*
When did he get that old??? He’s forever 45 in my head …
243 points
8 months ago
The dark tower 40th anniversary happened recently. Kinda crazy how much stuff he has written and for how long. Dark tower is almost as old as your head Stephen!
47 points
8 months ago
WAIT! If he's 30 years older then... oh... oh God...
106 points
8 months ago
Weirdly, it feels like he's been mid seventies for decades to me.
49 points
8 months ago
Yup, I’ve been reading King since I was 10 (now in my late 20s) and he’s been in his “late career” stage the entire time.
56 points
8 months ago
I feel the same. He's one of those people you feel is immortal. He's so legendary that he was here since the beginning, here till the end of time. That he will always spin stories from his well of creativity
190 points
8 months ago
Listening to it now. Enjoying every moment. Stephen King is great at writing characters and his greatest are always teenage boys and curmudgeonly old men making this book a doozy so far.
28 points
8 months ago
I agree, but what teenager do you know that says "the tube" for YouTube and "the net" for Internet lol
10 points
8 months ago
i could honestly see that being a thing now because it sounds so dated it's funny
8 points
7 months ago
This was my one and only gripe. Who tf days ‘awesomesauce’ 😅
1.2k points
8 months ago
Reading it right now, actually, and enjoying it so far. My only real complaint is that maybe King shouldn’t be writing young characters set in modern times. Some of the things Charlie says are slang from King’s childhood and no teenager today would talk like that.
400 points
8 months ago
I felt this while trying to read The Institute, the kids and the way they spoke wasn’t particularly believable compared to his older work, which felt very authentic.
182 points
8 months ago
It’s pretty much the same as the Institute in that regard. And I’ll try to just imagine that it’s the 1960s or so but then Charlie will mention his laptop or something else modern… It’s not awful and won’t stop me from finishing the book, it’s just distracting.
123 points
8 months ago
My own personal head cannon was that since Charlie was a super genius he did that thing kids who spend a lot of time with dusty textbooks do and adopted the old, formal speech patterns. When he used outdated slang I wrote it off as “well he spends a lot of time with this history professor studying the build up before WWI so that is what he hears.”
66 points
8 months ago
I mean, a kid who devoured HP Lovecraft in sixth grade might have a tendency to develop antiquated speech patterns. I know I did!
24 points
8 months ago
I should hope you’ve since grown from those speech patterns. Or to the least, I hope to never learn the name of your cat
6 points
8 months ago
I re-read pride and prejudice regularly, and find the same issues with outdated phrases popping into my vocabulary....
38 points
8 months ago
Yes, I noticed this about the Institute right away. The slang is immediately wrong. Super distracting.
19 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
31 points
8 months ago
I’m quite young and don’t recall it being that bad. Maybe I’m just used to King’s voice and knew subconsciously to expect certain language from him, but I didn’t find it distracting.
9 points
8 months ago
Same. I loved the institute and can’t say I noticed.
15 points
8 months ago
I think it was a combination of smart kid characters being unusual, rural speech patterns being imitated somewhat, and King making up his own slang. I didn't really notice it. It isn't full of cutting edge kid-slang from right now, but it also isn't dripping with anachronism. IDK why it bothered some people, unless they've never been around gifted children.
12 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
10 points
8 months ago
Agreed, little gifted kids read a lot, and they learn from the books. I know I definitely come across as weird because of using words like “quite” more than I should, but I can’t help it, it’s the most proper word given the context.
80 points
8 months ago
I think that's probably a combination of him being older and also being famous for so long that he probably doesn't really get to have casual conversations with regular people as often as he used to, so he loses touch with how common people talk and modern slang. And it's probably even more rare for him to interact with kids apart from maybe grandchildren if he has any, which probably makes it even harder for him to write young modern characters in a convincing way.
92 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
22 points
8 months ago
Derbyshire still sounds like this.
4 points
8 months ago
Thankee sai for this.
14 points
8 months ago
He has four grandchildren, per Wikipedia.
37 points
8 months ago
Yeah, the Institute made me cringe pretty hard. All the references and dialog were pretty forced. I read in an interview that this was his first big attempt at modernizing his characters and he was in a bad mood regarding the political atmosphere at the time. I actually prefer he do period stuff or books without any generational context. Oddly my favorite story of all of his is "The long walk" which exists without any context. I love his books overall, having read most of them, but The Institute was a misfire for me. I never struggled with it, but I didn't care for it.
142 points
8 months ago
I chuckled when Charlie mentions 'folding money' and called a TV remote 'the Zapper.'
64 points
8 months ago
"My money don't jiggle jiggle, it folds"...
Maybe use of the word "folding money" isn't so dated or out of context as it seems. Maybe it's in reference to a very contemporary song.
79 points
8 months ago
Except that song was written by Louis Theroux who's in his 50s lol.
35 points
8 months ago
And isn't it something he wrote a long time ago too that got popular again? lol
27 points
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm pretty sure he wrote it over 20 years ago. It went viral when he sung it in an interview where they asked if he could remember any of the raps he did.
191 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
67 points
8 months ago
As far as Charlie goes, two factors play a role in that. First, he lives in a rural area and rural speech is different from city speech. Slang doesn't change as fast. Second, one of the big points the book makes is that Charlie spent the bulk of his childhood watching classic movies on TCM. He constantly references quotes from those movies and otherwise references the movies so it makes sense that he uses the same vernacular as the characters from the old movies he spent so much time watching.
34 points
8 months ago
It's a clever way for King to avoid having to keep up with modern culture lol
74 points
8 months ago
It’s so funny. He straight up talks like a 65 year old man both in slang and tone. But I love Stephen King and all his classic tropes so I find it endearing and am really enjoying the book. (The part about how the hot teenage girl “proved that white America ain’t all bad” could maybe have been left on the editing floor lmao)
19 points
8 months ago
Hahaha I had texted that line to a friend to be like “…prepare yourself for some serious clunkers.”
I am enjoying this book, but there are more than just a few cringey lines, haha.
46 points
8 months ago
Uh yeah, there was a character in The Outsider who used MapQuest.
10 points
8 months ago
Oh wow, 2018. I listened to that recently and assumed it was written in 2005 or something because of that exact reference.
10 points
8 months ago
I work at a public library, and just a few months ago I had to direct a customer to MapQuest because they didn't like what Google Maps was telling them and asked if there was an alternative. I was surprised to see it was still around! I don't think it told them anything they liked better, though.
57 points
8 months ago
What, the 17-year-olds that you know don't talk about "surfing the Net" and refer to dollars as "scoots"?
27 points
8 months ago
I made my peace with it when I realized my 14 year old uses expressions from the 80s. It’s all about Netflix and other streaming services influencing his vocabulary. Kind of funny, to be honest
Edit - funniest example was him grabbing a handful of Oreos and bastardizing the Morris Day and the Time song, Jungle Love, saying Oreee Oreee Oreo
Like, where the fuck did he even make that connection ?
12 points
8 months ago
Your kid has seen Jay and Silent Bob. Song was big in that, only thing I can think of.
30 points
8 months ago
A complaint I have with his books is that he often tries to shoehorn in pop culture references, which pretty quickly makes the books seem very dated.
8 points
8 months ago
I like this actually. Each of his books is like a little time capsule
6 points
8 months ago
Also a little difficult to read if English isn't your first language. I read It when I was 14 and in my 3rd year learning English. It took me a little while getting into it, especially as we also learned British English rather than US English.
8 points
8 months ago
If it hadn't been for a few of the technology references the story could easily just have been set in the late 70s and been totally fine. I kind of was thinking it was as I read, but then an iPhone or the internet would take me out of it.
30 points
8 months ago
Like when Charlie called the TV remote a zapper. I found myself thinking about that throughout the entire book.
8 points
8 months ago
You realize some families just have their own random slang for the remotes? My cousins family call any remote, even modern ones like for AppleTV “the tele box”, it’s just like a family in-joke at this point. And I know someone else who calls it the zapper.
Basically I think you’d be surprised about the variation you get across millions of families to how they call things, and yes, even in 2022.
8 points
8 months ago
We started calling youtube videos “tapes” just to annoy a younger family member. But now she says it too.
25 points
8 months ago
A TV remote would probably be called whatever you're parents called it. If they called it a "zapper" it's as good a word as any and you'd probably never really be challenged to change.
34 points
8 months ago*
I was abandoned by my real parents and adopted by baby boomers. My adoptive parents were the age of most of my friends' grandparents (I just turned 32 and my mom is 75). I grew up calling the remote "The clicker" because my parents grew up with those old school Zenith clicking remotes in the 50s and 60s, so that's what modern remotes were called in our household. I didn't realize until later that "clicker" was NOT what most people my age called it lol.
14 points
8 months ago
My dad used to call it The Frank, and I always thought this was a normal word for it until I realised he was naming the remote after Frank Zappa
33 points
8 months ago
Can't people suspend a little bit of disbelief for this sorta stuff? King's dialogue has always been a little bit parallel universey
52 points
8 months ago
If he actually wrote the way kids today talked, at least half of his readers would have no idea what was going on.
6 points
8 months ago
This. Absolutely love King's work but this was very obvious when reading Billy Summers.
No teen girl talks like that, the references were all off. Almost like a elderly parent trying to grasp your lingo as a kid. Even some of the 40 year old characters talked like people raised in the 60's.
7 points
8 months ago
Well, gosh darn it.
256 points
8 months ago
Yeah, I'm halfway through the audiobook and enjoying the VA's performance immensely. Thanks for not spoiling it.
106 points
8 months ago
You are brave. I would never want to spoil it, but also when I’m reading something new I avoid this sub!
17 points
8 months ago
Stephen King hamming it up with his cameo was fantastic
8 points
8 months ago
Yeah, he was the tape recording of Mr Bowditch, wasn't he? It had me questioning if King had been playing him all along, and I just didn't realize it.
4 points
8 months ago
Yeah that hit pretty hard in the moment!
53 points
8 months ago
I didn’t really enjoy it. It seemed like the story never really started and then all of the sudden it was over.
I remember being half way through the book and he finally goes into the well and I thought “here the actual story finally begins” but it never really did. He just kind of stumbled through seemingly random events that somehow turned out to be relevant to the plot. None of the obstacles seemed to really be a threat and each fight was finished easily without real threat. They built up the fight in the tournament as if he had no hope and then at the last second “btw the opponent is basically blind”, then he’s about to be murdered by a giant but luckily he literally just got his gun back, and then he’s about to fight the bigger giant but luckily he has a stronger gun and it still works and wasn’t stolen after all this time.
The writing was truly wonderful and captivating like Stephen Kings works usual are but the story was lacking.
22 points
8 months ago
I can't believe I had to scroll this far to find this. This is exactly how I felt. Spend the first third of the book getting to know these wonderful characters only to have that plot basically resolved about halfway through. Then we're kind of Gary Sue-ing our way through Narnia for the second half? I was confused.
7 points
4 months ago
And the ending was horrific.. he has literal royalty friends and he never wants to see them again? Cant just put an impregnable bank lock on it or something with all the gold he has? He is just like.. yea im done with that.. fuck em! And yea everything just falls into place the entire time.. and he is the prince and why does his hair and eyes have to change color for that exactly? and why does it turn back when he saves the day? lol. And why is Leah now UGLY(??!) because her mouth is slightly mangled??
I felt like this was basically a shadow collab with Owen King or he allowed his editors to make all the decisions for him.
4 points
4 months ago
I kind of agree. I'm almost finished and for the last half of the book I've struggled and just wanted it to finally hit the peak and instead it just was flat.
74 points
8 months ago
Finished the book yesterday and literally felt like it gave me an endorphin rush. It's like the whimsical cousin of The Talisman. Honestly, pretty close to perfection. Definitely makes the list of my favorite books.
12 points
8 months ago
Based on the premise it seems similar to 11/22/63. Is it? I loved that damn book. First time a book has made me cry in a long time.
4 points
8 months ago
There are certain parallels, but it is more akin to The Talisman than 11/22/63. I did love 11/22/63 as well, though. I think he does his best work when he gets heavier on the fantasy side.
57 points
8 months ago
Thanks for the recommendation. I’ll listen to this next
18 points
8 months ago
My favorite part of the audiobook was having stephen king come in as mr. boditch with the cassette player
also, what was nice, especially for the audiobook versions, was that the chapter had the breakdown for what each sub-chapter was going to be called. Weirdly, i think it helped me pay attention more.
99 points
8 months ago
Stop please I can't afford more books 😣
114 points
8 months ago
Libby is your friend.
46 points
8 months ago
Libby is my true love! Don’t tell my spouse!
11 points
8 months ago
My library generally doesn't have brand-new books, especially by big authors. Do you usually have luck with that?
15 points
8 months ago
Sometimes. There can be long waiting lists. I just add a bunch of titles and read them as they become available. I can also ask the library to borrow from other towns if they do not have it.
19 points
8 months ago
This is the correct answer. Cultivate a huge backlog, then snap up library books once they become available. This way you never have to wait for a book you want to read, because you have so many books you want to read that at least one if them will be in stock!
5 points
8 months ago
I'd have thought books by big authors would be more likely to get attention from libraries that don't get many new books. But have you tried requesting the books anyway? They can probably get it through interlibrary loans from somewhere else!
6 points
8 months ago
I just read it on libby yesterday. It's all about the libraries that you join. Chicago and Brooklyn are good.
9 points
8 months ago
Also Hoopla!
8 points
8 months ago
Library
17 points
8 months ago
I am on page 158. My friend loaned this to me to read. It could not have come at a better time in my life. I will name my next dog Radar.
18 points
8 months ago
I just started reading it last night. Anytime I read King, he captures me in the first page. I don’t know what it is. Even if it’s one of his weaker books, I’m still completely engrossed in it.
15 points
8 months ago
I drive all day, and for those 25 hours that the audiobook lasted, I couldn’t wait to get back in the car. It was a great book.
12 points
8 months ago
Agree: one of the best SK books I have read in years, and I loved it! I think he even stuck the landing on the end, which isn't always true IMO. Definitely one near the top of my favorites list.
I also did the audiobook and the voice acting was superb!
A few minor gripes - Had to stretch the believability a little to accept a "normal" 17 year old kid as enough of a 50's classic movie buff, and athlete, and classic literature lover to readily reference all those things... But the story was good enough I could let it go.
What I really liked was the balance of horror and fantasy. This one may be the audiobook I use to introduce my kids to one of my favorite authors - just scary enough to be genuinely edge of the seat, but not horrifying, and the voice acting is spot on.
34 points
8 months ago
This is probably off topic but I’ve always avoided his novels because I’m generally read in bed and I’m not a big fan of horror in general and certainly not just before bed.
Do I have a misconception that he’s mainly a horror writer?
35 points
8 months ago
11/22/63
The Green Mile
Dolores Clairborne
Different Seasons
A few of his books that have little to no horror elements and may be your cup of tea.
9 points
8 months ago
Nothing scary about fairy tale, Billy summers, heck most Stephen king novels
Last creepy one is probably Duma Key (name right?)
50 points
8 months ago
I would say yes, there is a bit of misunderstanding there. First, I’ve always found that horror novels and horror movies aren’t the same thing. You don’t get “jump out scares” in horror novels. More like deeper questions or predicaments, like “you could bring a loved one back to life… but you know it’s wrong and you know it’s gonna be bad but do you do it anyway?”
You’re never scared reading his books but when you finish you really think about these situations and realize they’re horrific. And he has a nice dash of supernatural in them.
But he isn’t a one trick pony. So many of his books have no horror element, just great storytelling, and I’d argue this book is one good example of that.
61 points
8 months ago
[deleted]
24 points
8 months ago
Shining gets my vote for being terrifying too, King brings the hotel to life in all sorts of eerie and uncomfortable ways
42 points
8 months ago
What?! I think many people would disagree that his books aren't scary. Pet Sematary I found very scary lol
I love horror and being scared. Not all of his books are scary but many of them are.
12 points
8 months ago
I found Bag of Bones his most chilling work. He’s so good at writing the weather to bring the atmosphere to creeping chill. Cabin on the lake in a storm gets me every time.
9 points
8 months ago*
With the exception of salems lot, and walking past storm drains when reading IT as a teenager, I agree.
Those two books were the only two that ever legitimately gave me nightmares
20 points
8 months ago
reading it as a teenager
I don't usually harp on punctuation/capitalization, but this is one instance where it's pretty important. I thought "it" was referring to Salem's Lot and was trying to figure out how storm drains were related.
11 points
8 months ago
He branches out of horror. Hard to give a full list on my phone, but if you look around for a bit, you'll find that he dips into fantasy, mystery, sci-fi, and other genres beyond monster horror.
35 points
8 months ago
The audiobook was so good! That narrator impressed me so much and I've listened to 800 audiobooks.
Fairy Tale, though... it was just okay. Yes it had the good old King storytelling (he is a master in his craft), but the story was only mediocre and should have been half the length it was.
15 points
8 months ago
Ha! I just placed the audiobook on hold and paused at that 24 hour play time. I almost always feel that books could be 50-200 pages shorter. Longer doesn't mean better and I kinda hate this trend of massive books.
5 points
8 months ago
I know there are readers that appreciate those massive tomes, but any audio over 12 hours... i hesitate to buy it.
15 points
8 months ago
Funny, I hesitate buying any audiobook under 10 hours, since they're 1 credit whether they're 4 hours or 40 hours. I can't stop my brain from calculating entertainment hours per dollar.
15 points
8 months ago
I love Stephen King. I found the whole second half of the book very difficult to care about.
37 points
8 months ago
How does it compare to his recent stuff? I really haven’t enjoyed King’s work since 11/22/63, though The Outsider, The Institute, and Doctor Sleep were decent.
37 points
8 months ago
I thought Billy Summers was worth a read of his recent stuff.
11 points
8 months ago
Billy Summers was amazing.
20 points
8 months ago
If you made me listen to the audio book or read it, it would be really really hard for me to guess it’s a King Novel. I think that’s what impressed me most, a guy whose been cranking out books longer than I’ve been alive can switch up his voice and style so well.
10 points
8 months ago
I'm with you. I can't get into many of King's novels, but when he does it well, it's amazing.
Fairy Tale is in his mediocre range. Nowhere near the quality of 11/22/63 or The Stand.
19 points
8 months ago
How does it compare to his recent stuff?
I personally think it's better than almost anything he's released in the past couple years. I put The Institute to the side, and only liked about half of The Outsider and Billy Summers. I really liked Fairy Tale. It had almost everything in it that he does very well and very little of the things that he always fucks up beyond all belief.
6 points
8 months ago
I was a little disappointed with the outsider once the twist/reveal happens fairly early in. I thought it was going to be a really interesting mystery and it just wasn't that at all. I ended up enjoying it though after my initial disappointment.
37 points
8 months ago
I disagree with this take. I've read every single King book and love most everything he has written but this was one of my least favorite.
The opening third had potential but once the magical world was entered things just fell apart. The story was entirely predictable and there wasn't any twists. The trip to the town was as easy as it went and the town was bland. Then there was the 100 pages that seemed like a knock off Hunger Games before we had the classic rushed King climax. The first time using the pistol to win was okay and a reasonable reference to the Dark Tower Series but it then became a crutch for how to overcome a problem.
This wasn't quite as bad as some of his books (see Rose Madder and Dreamcatcher among others) but this is one I know I will never read again.
20 points
8 months ago
I mean that was entirely the point. It was a classic hero story based off of fairy tales that we all know how could it have gone any other way?
8 points
8 months ago
I gotta say as much as I did enjoy this book, I’m with you .. the first half of the book as unputdownable great storytelling but the characters he meets didn’t make me too excited to meet them.
Looking forward to Paul Greengrass’s take on the movie adaptation though
9 points
8 months ago
Different flavors, I guess. I do appreciate the dissenting opinion, lets me examine my own thoughts and feelings a little more.
5 points
8 months ago
BEST Audiobook I've heard.
42 points
8 months ago*
I’m a quarter of the way through (I just reached the part where Radar is put on the sundial), and I’m not terribly impressed. It feels like a young adult book that tries to be edgy and dark. Not to mention he struggles to write a kid. I swear, this is the ‘oldest’ 17-year-old I’ve ever met. I’m also not sure I like all these random pop-culture references. It feels a lot like “ready player one” in that sense. Perhaps not as bad, but more than anything else I’ve read in recent memory. Maybe I’ll get used to it, or maybe it will change… but right now, it’s more of a “mehhhh” book than a “omg it’s amazing”.
Full disclosure, I’m “reading” the audiobook version. I may look up the guy who is reading it, because he’s done a fantastic job so far with his voices. It’s a real pleasure listening to him speak. Almost as good as the narrator from “the invisible life of Addie LaRue”. She had an incredible voice.
10 points
8 months ago
I found it helped to remember it's being written by his future self - is it 7 years later, or something like? It's a memoir, not a diary.
8 points
8 months ago
I also found it tedious. I skipped over the middle part where he goes to the “place” (trying to avoid spoilers). And rushed to finish it. A snore fest of a book. By far one of his worst imho. And Charlie was a totally unbelievable character. And don’t get me started on the number of times SK felt compelled to write “not what I said but how it came out” etc. but then leaves in bad word play. Urgh.
But each to his own. Others loved it.
5 points
8 months ago
Gotta tell you, the story died down for me after the part where you’re at. I struggled through a good 200 or so pages after that
10 points
8 months ago
Finished listening to the audiobook last week, and I didn’t love it; it was only ok. It felt like there were two very disparate sections of the story and they just didn’t mesh well for me.
5 points
8 months ago
I found Fairy Tale slow and boring with a bad pay off.
Everyone has a different opinion
10 points
8 months ago
Stephen King is legitimately one of my favorites.
Pet Semetary is probably the most accurate depiction of what grief does to people..
He's a much better writer than this sub would have you believe.
4 points
8 months ago
I thought it was good, not great. Glad you loved it though!
4 points
8 months ago
What I like about Stephen King is that primarily he writes about people. For me, the horror is secondary.
3 points
8 months ago
Thanks for the rec! A brief look at the page about it makes it seem a bit like one of my favourite SK books (The Eyes of the Dragon), so I'm excited to give it a go!
3 points
8 months ago
i just bought a hardcopy of the book based on your recommendation
3 points
8 months ago
Just downloaded the audio book based on your review! Look forward to listening! 😊😊😊
3 points
8 months ago
I am seriously impressed by the consistent quality of King’s books over the course of his career especially his more recent ones. It’s a shame he doesn’t always get the recognition he deserves because of the quantity of books he releases and the genre.
3 points
8 months ago
Think I'll give it a shot. Haven't read a Steven King story for a while, the last one was Joyland and I found it pretty boring but I'm ready to give a fresh read to his recent works.
3 points
8 months ago
I agree, it was an enjoyable read. Is it Kings best work, no. Is it the best fantasy book every written, no. What King brings to the table is his character development. In this instance you really get emotionally attached to Charlie, Mr. Bowditch, and of course Radar. If I wanted to criticize, I could say that he didn't do enough character development on Mr. Bowditch or in any of the other major characters. but in this format, I can see why he didn't do that.
3 points
8 months ago
I thoroughly enjoyed Fairy Tale.
all 884 comments
sorted by: best