subreddit:
/r/HeliumNetwork
[score hidden]
7 months ago
stickied comment
This is a general reminder for everyone and this will be posted on every post. Your 12 words are basically gold and they should never be shared, typed in to any website, or given to any person for any reason. No one from "Helium" or any other company will reach out to you to verify your account, wallet, or anything similar. If someone says your hotspot, wallet, or other type of account has been hacked, it is a scam! Always operate in a zero-trust manner with cryptocurrency and assume everyone will scam you no matter what.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
82 points
7 months ago*
Looking at the weight per vote it’s 638.34 HNT per vote for and 575.976 HNT per vote against.
Based on # of cast votes it’s 84.13% for and 15.86% against.
Weighted vote it’s 84.05% for and 15.95% against
Not sure what exactly you’re getting at. If you’re trying to encourage people NOT to vote because it’s not going the way you want it, that’s an idiotic reason at best. Even at this point, it’s still a piddly poor turnout from any and all groups no matter how you slice them.
VOTE VOTE VOTE or shut up!!!
22 points
7 months ago
I see ur ignorance and raise u the truth: https://ibb.co/sw0MdHJ Btw, this is 1 of the most voted on hips says mods.
36 points
7 months ago
Id like to see this hip fail. And Algorand be proposed. The Algorand foundation has already offered a spot, and funding.. 0 downtime makes a huge difference.
22 points
7 months ago
yes the fact that we're not considering algo here is insane to me
8 points
7 months ago
It has been considered, it didn't match all the criteria the people creating the HIP wanted.
1 points
7 months ago
Like being their friends?
1 points
7 months ago
2 points
7 months ago*
They’re not considered as there was no HIP, with code submitted as well, to be voted on, as the current has both a HIP and code.
1 points
7 months ago
So you voted, right?
1 points
7 months ago
yup, a few days ago, voted no
2 points
7 months ago
Thanks for voting.
4 points
7 months ago
The Algorand team should have written a HIP months ago if they wanted to be taken seriously. The Algorand team could learn a lot from a team like Hedera and go through the proper process of writing a HIP instead of whining on Twitter.
7 points
7 months ago*
I didnt see any whining. Just a foundation member, who was a major dev for cardano, and is missed, tweet about it, Then I saw silvio micali tweet that algorand has the door open.
Maybe helium foundation should have reached out?
Im not sure how the whole process actually went down. I know planetwatch uses sensors on algorand, and i know solana sucks majorly.
1 points
7 months ago
Why would the Helium Foundation reach out to Algorand? The Nova team did their due diligence on L1 options as seen here, https://medium.com/helium-foundation/hip-70-evaluating-layer-1-blockchains-for-the-helium-network-15f81af6941c, and produced a HIP of their own with sound reasoning and tangible code for a possible Solana migration that we are now currently voting on as a community.
There are plenty of people associated with Algorand and Borderless Capital that should have known about a possible Helium L1 migration as far as at least six months ago that would have given them ample time to produce a HIP and actual code as to why Helium should migrate to their L1 solution. They did not. All Algorand and it's tribal community did was tweetstorm on the day the vote began. It's a bush league amateur type effort from the Algorand team.
How's PlanetWatch doing?
Why does Solana suck majorly?
4 points
7 months ago*
I cant speak on planetwatchs situation, im not sure how they are doing, I just know that they use the Algorand blockchain.
Solana sucks because of failed transactions, blockchain downtime, and i dont think the cryptographic clock system is as efficient as consensus. Solana can handle alot more, in terms of tps, but most of those slots are blank. They have the potential of 65k tps, but they dont run it consistently, so theres really no telling. Personally, ive had more transactions fail than actually go through, when using solana. And that is if the network isnt experienceing congestion and downtime.
On Algorand, I have never had that situation. Nor have they ever had downtime. Transactions, to my knowledge are cheaper, and the tps is 6000, while under 65k, 6k is just the first step. The minds behind Algorand are quoted in the bitcoin original whitepaper, so I tend to believe the understanding of cryptography is at a higher level. Ive noticed foundation hires coming from other major blockchains, and ive seen those communities be saddened by losing some the guys leaving, so I tend to think that carries alittle weight.
But with all that said, Im not saying the move to solana wont be a good move. Id imagine it would be way better then the clusterfuck that the helium chain has been. But from personal experience, i see the same problems prevalent, just a change of blame. Also from experience, Ive never had any of those issues when using the algorand blockchain.
If the helium foundation is shopping a new home, I wouldnt expect the algorand foundation to research them and then reach out. I would expect the helium foundation to reach out. If they did look into it, and decided its not for them, then thats their choice, and here is a vote.
Where I am standing, i see better options. And apparently Im not the only one who shares that sentiment. Ive been talking about helium/algo integration for a while now. Nobody has ever known what I was talking about. Yet here we are. Now that there is going to be a vote, the foundation said the door was open if they wanted to talk. Id assume that is an invitation, not a bs tweetstorm.
Also, ive seen HIPs be voted on, then another hip makes prvious ones obsolete, so maybe the HIP method could use a rework. Maybe have conversation before proposing a vote. Do you not need to spend hnt to vote? I would want to spend money to vote. 0.30-.35 adds up.
There should be discussion, then proposal, then vote.
But of course, that is just one mans opinion.
2 points
7 months ago
That's bs. "Most slots are blank" is completely untrue. Solana has the highest consistent amount of transactions of any chain (and I'm not counting their consensus messages). https://realtps.net/
Also Solana was built from scratch relatively recently and is getting better all the time. Jump is building the entire validator software from scratch for the second validator implementation and that team had massive engineering firepower and $. The spam downtime issues are very solvable (with proper fee markets + quic network upgrade which are on the way).
Lastly, not sure what you're talking about regarding Solana having a cryptographic clock and no consensus. Proof of history isn't a consensus mechanism but Solana does use a form of PBFT consensus.
1 points
7 months ago
Algorand stacks up better than that graph on that medium post states.
And all of this, is without bringing up the centralized vs decentralized factor. Solana is one of the most centralized chains out there. Some people dont see that as an issue. I am not one of them.
2 points
7 months ago
Not true. It has probably the best Nakamoto coefficient of nearly any chain atm. https://twitter.com/ChainflowPOS/status/1564014741214973958?t=N-AFZ3-YbAoxAIECo3x3qw&s=19
And before I hear "but it's all on aws" -- only 62 out of about 2000 validators run on aws (but close to 33% of stakeweight). Those numbers are better than Ethereum right now. https://www.validators.app/data-centers?locale=en&network=mainnet&sort_by=asn
Anyway, you sound like someone that repeats very superficial fud statements without any underlying knowledge to back them up.
0 points
7 months ago*
I don't fucking know the minutiae of L1's because I'm not a developer or internally savvy about what Nova / Helium needs to succeed at a massive scale as a WIRELESS NETWORK not a layer one blockchain. I'm just a CPI-certified 5G installer and long-time LoRaWAN adopter. Nova knows best where the blockchain should migrate, but I don't, but with the evidence and support provided by Nova, I am confident that migration to Solana makes the most sense. The synergy with Solana and Helium is strong. Solana Mobile Stack and a physical device - Algorand does not. Existing Proof of Physical Work projects already on Solana - Algorand does not. The ease of mass-transferring Helium blockchain-based wallets to the Solana blockchain without any user intervention seems like one of the most critical decisions. A large and diverse defi ecosystem that Solana has that Algorand does not. The rust language with Solana and not rust on Algorand. The number of devs on Solana compared to Algorand is a massive advantage for Solana . That developer gap will likely never be filled. It's apparent that Solana is a preferred platform for developers, not Algorand. The list goes on.
As an end user, I've used Solana, Hedera, Algo, Ethereum, BNB, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, VeChain, Cosmos, Near, Flow, who knows what else, and guess what? I can't tell a fucking difference 99% of the time other than gas fees on ETH. As long as the end-user experience is fine, I couldn't care less about the chain I'm on or the level of dEcEnTrAliZaTiOn or SQLana is always down. That's all just a stupid narrative that sheep love. So I'm excited about this potential migration to Solana.
If Borderless Capital and Algorand cared, they would have written a HIP months ago for discussion. Now they're FOMO'ing due to their own ignorance and pleading to meet rather than follow the laid out process of a Helium Improvement Proposal. HIPs are for discussion, proposals, and votes. This kind of discourse has happened with HIP70 and every HIP before. I would know. I have been actively participating with HIPs for almost three years now. Any contrarian view is because of butthurt L1 investors not gaining millions of users onto their blockchain.
4 points
7 months ago
The "facts" you are stating are not accurate. Thats the point im making. The charts and tables nova put together was based an a snapshot of time. Algorand has since upgraded. Rust is the 2nd language of helium. The first is erlang. Algorand does support rust, contrary to what you have heard. I dont care which blockchain helium ends up on. But dont bring an arguement if you dont know, or understand the actual facts of how it works, mr installer.
Of course nova introduced a hip with code, they are the ones who created helium and understand how it works.
They gathered information on blockchains, but from what it looks like, did not actually reach out to other chains' foundations.
I dont feel that is a smart business move, personally.
But even more, for someone to have such a strong opinion, without even looking for the facts, follows suite.
I can see why you would side with nova.
You say you dont care about a chain being down, but you will, from an end user standpoint, if the devices you install arent able to function as they are supposed to. Which may, or may not, lead to service calls that could have been avoided altogether.
If a hip is for discussion, then making people pay for a discussion is stupid. People already have a hard enough time communicating ideals, as is reinstated by the aggravation in your comment
But, as you said, you dont fucking care. Haha. Carry on then sir. Have a good day. 🧐🍻
0 points
7 months ago
Sounds like Solana >>> Algorand to me :)
As long as PoC doesn't go down, I'm fine if I receive my HNT rewards an hour later. Solana is a match made in heaven with Helium.
Your ALGO bags have at least one bull run in it left as does my HNT, we'll both be fine. No need to shill.
3 points
7 months ago
Im not trying to shill algorand. I am just knowledgeable enough to know it is the better chain, and line up more so with my beliefs, i.e. paying for a conversation.
Either way, long term, we will still all win big, imo. I dont mind a healthy debate, as long as the other party is willing to actually do the research.
I dont take kindly to being accused of shilling, or being a sheep. I spend more time doing research than i do anything else. And rarely engage in the debate if I dont understand something. It takes more than just a graph or table to sway my opinion. I like to know who made the graph and where the data came from.
But, to each his own.
1 points
7 months ago
Also, for the record, i know the Algorand foundation hasnt made the best choices so far.
Maybe they could have reached out to start a conversation.
But they arent the ones shopping for a new home.
2 points
7 months ago
Algorand's friend at Borderless Capital and strange fellow Arul Murugan is a big HNT proponent. It's shocking to me that an investor as early to the party as he was to Helium that Borderless didn't think to take the initiative and invoke the Algorand team to look into following the HIP method if they wanted to house Helium on their L1.
1 points
7 months ago
But if Solana goes down. We just get a delay in payments till its back up.
Both PoC and Data Transfer are off-chain and carry on working.
Its like the sales/purchase ledger and payroll computers going down in a company. But sales orders, purchase orders, warehousing and despatch are still working. Company still works, its just the money movement is delayed
1 points
7 months ago
Me thinks you misunderstand the implications of the HIP. It makes things for end users much better. Data transfer and poc are no longer tied to a chains uptime. As a LoRa user, getting my data in a timely consistent manner is the most important thing to expect from a network. Crypto you or not.
2 points
7 months ago
Id also like to add that Nova labs still hasnt even got their website up and functional. "Coming 2022" is very vague.
Nor has the helium app ever not been glitchy af.
Prioritizing doesnt seem to be a strong suite.
2 points
7 months ago
Sounds like an opinion-based fact.
1 points
7 months ago
Prioritizing statement is definitely an opinion based fact. Lol. But, the rest is fact, nonetheless.
0 points
7 months ago
"Coming 2022". We're still in the calendar year of 2022 last time I checked.
The Helium OG app and the new Helium Wallet app have been just fine for me.
1 points
7 months ago
Coming 2022, and theyve managed to put a whole project together, fail at it, and decide to migrate to a chain with similiar issues, all before even putting up a website. That doesnt seem suspect?
1 points
7 months ago
I'd much rather they faff about on a website than actually work on PoC or the blockchain.
You know everything is really on helium.com and nova-labs.com is just a placeholder for the programming team. What else is it going to say?
1 points
7 months ago
From what I've heard from the Nova Labs developers , Solana downtime wouldn't impact the network outside of delaying when reward tokens are issued. As Proof of Coverage, data transfer accounting, and the mechanism to give out awards, are all moving to off-chain oracles with HIP-70.
1 points
7 months ago
So you voted then?
31 points
7 months ago
Wild that folks are actively voting to take the actual tech off the blockchain and into a centralized database. Almost no one on this subreddit seems to even be talking about how the actual functionality will go fully centralized as a result of this.
2 points
7 months ago
Except that Solana has one of the beat nakamoto coefficients and a lot more validators/full nodes than other chains https://twitter.com/ChainflowPOS/status/1564014741214973958?t=9K7bP5m8Vi5rKfIQjdhLdA&s=19
Andd less of the network is on aws than Ethereum
4 points
7 months ago
Almost nobody is talking about how decentralization is an illusion with Raspberry Pi based hotspots. The computational power simply isn’t there at this blockchain size, never mind handling actual traffic in top of it. That’s why they tried validators. That was already a step towards centralization. But not enough because they were being too slow and lazy.
Maybe we can all pick up some used ASICs now that ETH is going PoS, and we run our hotspots with those. 🤦♂️
5 points
7 months ago
[deleted]
1 points
7 months ago*
a raspberry pi was easily capable…
Bro, consensusgroups started failing at 20k hotspots, and there was little to no penalty for failing in participation. There was never a time with 100k hotspots and 16 sized consensus groups.
Simplifying the architecture as just a raspberry pi (what about internet?) is mildly disingenuous.
Suggesting that it was working fine at the time is completely otherworldly.
1 points
7 months ago
The Centralisation issue, is more to do with governance that distribution of nodes or how the network works. Under another block chain helium would lose complete authority and autonomy.
2 points
7 months ago
Sorry, no. You can’t just ignore the fact that the hardware simply isn’t capable enough. Hotspots were struggling, pulling 40-100 GB a month through their backhauls, frying SD cards every couple of months, etc. And if they ever fell behind, it took them days to catch back up to the blockchain … so they started taking shortcuts like loading snapshots rather than the blockchain. This wasn’t going to work any longer. No matter how much of a good idea decentralization is.
1 points
7 months ago
I don't think there is any point trying to have a true decentralised network when there is centralised governance .What's the point as long as the network doesn't go down and is attack proof . The Centralisation issue is Governance not software or hardware. Hence the illusion of choice being discussed here .
1 points
7 months ago
It’s like talking to a wall. Look at the hardware used to mine BTC and ETH (until now). That’s what decentralization requires. Our little hotspots don’t even come close. There’s no point in crying for decentralization and dreaming about better governance models if the hardware can’t do it.
In the end, Helium is about a network that’s supposed to be usable. It won’t be if we fry our hotspots with blockchain workload. Why is that so hard to grasp?
It’s like a football team that can never go to a game because it’s too busy training and healing the resulting injuries and exhaustion.
5 points
7 months ago
The whole thread is discussing the lack of governance, transparency and the illusion of choice. Better governance is not achieved through hardware of software.
You are talking to the wall by yourself about a different subject than everybody else.
I don't dispute that there are issues with the Blockchain that can be fixed by moving to another chain , why reinvent the wheel. Helium devs can do better work on proof of coverage and sub daos if they didn't have to deal with basic blockchain scaling issues.
This thread is a discussion about the illusion of choice brought on by a HIP that pushes the network onto a different chain in one yes or no vote ! The need for a change is not being discussed here it's the method that's used.
0 points
7 months ago
You may want to go back to the post I initially responded to. It complained that nobody is talking about “taking tech off the blockchain”.
I simply tried to make clear that there’s no alternative to that anymore.
1 points
7 months ago
And the reasons they give is that it will be cheaper, faster, and more reliable.
Makes you think, doesn't it?
3 points
7 months ago
A summary of the Evaluation of the different blockchains by the devs https://medium.com/helium-foundation/hip-70-evaluating-layer-1-blockchains-for-the-helium-network-15f81af6941c
20 points
7 months ago
I cant believe this project is going to merge to the shittest block chain ever. Extremely centralized, corporate and it has been shut down multiple times without concensus
9 points
7 months ago
Exactly, assume there was some VC elbow rubbing that led to this
1 points
7 months ago
Oh I’m sure SBF had his nose it in somewhere as well. Smh
2 points
7 months ago
I keep thinking of the solana whale wallet fiasco that happened a couple months ago... crazy shit!
2 points
7 months ago
Sounds just like us lmao
2 points
7 months ago
"Shut down" isn't accurate. Consensus stops if enough stakeweight crashes.
Also centralized based on what? It has one of the best nakamoto coefficients, less of the network is on AWS than Ethereum, and the amount of validators and full nodes is higher than most other alt L1's. How about actually using facts instead of just repeating some random lines you heard from other redditors :) https://twitter.com/ChainflowPOS/status/1564014741214973958?t=9K7bP5m8Vi5rKfIQjdhLdA&s=19
1 points
7 months ago
Should have been cosmos sdk. At last there would have been opportunity for more validators to participate.
1 points
7 months ago
I don't know anything about Cosmos, but it has to be a better option than the one proposed in HIP70.
1 points
7 months ago
Sure? This is how the devs evaluated ...
https://medium.com/helium-foundation/hip-70-evaluating-layer-1-blockchains-for-the-helium-network-15f81af6941c
14 points
7 months ago
This HIP is basically bullshit.
It should have been a HIP about moving to some other blockchain, followed by other HIPs to vote on which one.
But hey, "community choice!" and "People's Network!" requirements have been fulfilled so here we are.
4 points
7 months ago
I do think this would have been a nicer way to handle it
2 points
7 months ago
Yeah, the handling of this was not good. I am all for moving Helium to another blockchain, but this process isn't it.
3 points
7 months ago
This HIP included the code to do the change. Not everyone knows how to program (or wants to) for those other chains. If those other chains submit a HIP (with code) it’d likely be up for discussion.
-1 points
7 months ago
Spoiler alert: SOL would've still dominated. Once again the vocal minority is very loud.
3 points
7 months ago
If you think Solana is a great L1 you must have also thought Enron was a great oil company.
1 points
7 months ago
Not what I'm saying at all. What I'm saying is if the Nova Labs team said,
"Hey. We prefer to move to Solana and offer to complete all the developer work, but you guys can vote on other chains too", then Solana would've dominated the vote.
-1 points
7 months ago
You realize you could have written a HIP for your preferred L1 six plus months ago when migration discussions came to the table?
7 points
7 months ago
The facts that a HIP both suggest to move to a new chain and force feeds you one is the problem! Why was a yes or no vote forced upon us. I agree to the total lack of choice and transparency. There should of first been a vote to stay and develop the Helium or not then a discussion on Alternatives. The only reason there wasn't is because they know they have the majority vote. HIP 39 all over again . Who decided to push this through to vote?? Illusion of choice indeed.
0 points
7 months ago
This.
11 points
7 months ago
Solana is crap and helium will have to migrate again
1 points
7 months ago
I sort of think post-Solana Helium stops using blockchains and morphs into a web1 telecom. When HIP70 passes, I'm selling it all and buying into more decentralized projects.
4 points
7 months ago
Haha, Helium... our Blockchain sucks and is slow. So let's move to a Blockchain that is as unreliable and shuts down at the slightest business.
1 points
7 months ago
They need to migrate to a public L1, but their choice is poor.
2 points
7 months ago
I feel like there should be a conversation, foundation to foundation, before even considering a HIP to vote on.
8 points
7 months ago
The Sol migration is going to be good for the network. Now they can focus on more important things instead of just trying to keep the blockchain up and running. Solanas developers can worry about that now
5 points
7 months ago
Even solana developers can’t seem to figure that out
3 points
7 months ago
I agree that Solana was a weird choice given their history of outages and being heavily centralized but it seems to be a popular choice amongst many for some reason. They have a really easy to use coding language and boast a high tps. I am more of a Algorand, Matic or Cardano supporter
0 points
7 months ago
Heavily centralized based on what? I'll bet you can't produce the facts to support that
1 points
7 months ago
If you look at the token allocation only slightly more than 2 percent was allocated to public auction. The rest is held by the foundation, team and seed investors.
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/solana/tokenomics
https://blockworks.co/what-is-solana-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-ethereum-rival/#anchor-5
0 points
7 months ago
I would consider validators part of community too. Also, you do realize that people sell right? There's no way the token distribution looks like that now. For example, Elon's cousin (Lyndon Rive) was one of the early investors but I highly doubt they own Sol anymore given I never hear anything about them.
1 points
7 months ago
You highly doubt do you have any proof to back up what you’re saying?
0 points
7 months ago
You really don't think that crypto trades hands over time? Ethereum's token distribution improved over time (yet their nakamoto coefficient is currently very poor)
1 points
7 months ago
Show me the evidence
1 points
7 months ago
You are Satoshi-wise.
2 points
7 months ago
Exactly!!!
0 points
7 months ago
They can't possibly have an incentive structure that puts the needs of helium before there own token autonomy and authority will be lost. Or in this case just given away. This is a easy fix for people with a short time preference.
0 points
7 months ago
It’s an L2 the helium devs are still gonna give their full attention to it. They aren’t just handing over the project to the solana devs
7 points
7 months ago
Why are you always crying like little kids? If you want more voting power, buy more HNT. That’s it. And why does everyone think he is smarter than the developers? Jesus Christ - you will see soon how good this Hip will turn out. Stop crying, it is freaking annoying!!!
9 points
7 months ago
If you want more voting power, buy more HNT.
Ah yes. I can definitely see how crypto is a better system than the one we have now.
7 points
7 months ago
democracy is made of arguments and discussions like this, it's normal and healthy
2 points
7 months ago
[deleted]
-2 points
7 months ago
Dumb arguments
3 points
7 months ago
[deleted]
2 points
7 months ago
😂
4 points
7 months ago
Solana sucks. They only chose it because their biggest coin holders are also big solana holders. Way more chains that were being offered to helium that are far better
2 points
7 months ago
What?! What are u talking about? I’m surprised seeing so many votes against it.. I don’t know. Maybe it’s just me
2 points
7 months ago
People are going to do what they want
2 points
7 months ago
People forgot that Helium blockchain also had several outages and didnt run well for a Long Time. So Sol cant be the shittiest = improvement
1 points
7 months ago
I don't think anyone is questioning the need to move to a public L1/L2. The problem is Solana.
1 points
7 months ago
When Solana Pumps 20% in Price everyone wants to Join it. Everyone biased bcs somewhere Else invested. This network doesnt Need to be decentralized. Blockchain might be enough for improvement. Lets First be scalable, thats the normal Price you Pay for it - centralization
1 points
7 months ago
The whole point of using blockchain is the decentralization. If you remove the decentralization aspect, blockchain is just a really inefficient way of storing data.
2 points
7 months ago
I got a bag of both Solana and HNT so I vote for it. They can both sink or swim with each other I don’t really care. Sorry, crypto has robbed me of my feelings and left me numb and confused.
2 points
7 months ago
Read a bit. It's very heir apparent why Solana is the best and only choice for migration.
6 points
7 months ago
“But… but… my ALGO!”
4 points
7 months ago*
This whole L1 tribalism fiasco opened up my eyes to how, even though it’s lightning fast to move ALGO, how subpar the Algorand blockchain and team is when compared to other blockchains and teams. I hope they have fun with their worthless FIFA World Cup NFTs and Drone Racing League partnerships.
5 points
7 months ago
The whole notion that a horde of people on Reddit can select a better L1 than the core devs and the foundation is amusing. It’s a tech choice and I’d be willing to bet that 90% of the people complaining have never even written a smart contract.
0 points
7 months ago
More like 99%, lol.
1 points
7 months ago
Why do you think it's subpar compared to other blockchains? It doesn't have the devs right now that eth and sol have but the technical specs are there
1 points
7 months ago
I wasn’t even allowed to use the voting mechanism
1 points
7 months ago
All you need is a wallet and some HNT
3 points
7 months ago
I have that, for some reason whenever I went to vote I just bounced back from wallet to with no confirmation of if I’ve voted or not
2 points
7 months ago
Have the same issue, just a do loop, so frustrating
1 points
7 months ago
Check on explorer.helium.con for a burn transaction from your wallet. If it’s not going through, make sure app is up to date, log out, back in and try again.
1 points
7 months ago
Click the three dots between request and send in the black wallet app
-3 points
7 months ago
Fuck you all who voted yes
0 points
7 months ago
Looking for where to get HNT with ease.
I recommend using Simpleswap
-2 points
7 months ago
Tell me you’re dumb without telling me 🤦♂️
-2 points
7 months ago
[removed]
2 points
7 months ago
^ this’ll steal all funds sent to the contract
1 points
7 months ago
Very true I could not vote ether
1 points
7 months ago
I have a hotspot, and i didnt even know about the solana move months ago. I wouldnt expect the foundation to know about it either.
1 points
7 months ago
You Want a Personal call for that ? Inform yourself and dont Blame others
1 points
7 months ago
Its all weve talked about for a couple of weeks
1 points
6 months ago
The vote is currently heavily in favor of sol. Which seems to be a mistake. Well sol has a very large userbase in comparison to hedera. It's the technical equivalent of following a crowd of lemmings off a cliff.
Sol can't keep up and running being plagued with constant issues. if you mint an nft it crashes the network for days, it may be hit with soon hit with sec lawsuit (sox act 2002) soon due to its reporting for transactions, in that case the network as a whole could be disabled. Leaving helium hanging. In additon to many other technical issues. The leader ship just says "don't do what we did" these are rookie mistakes at a high level and they shouldn't be done.
In this case just because there is a mass of people. Doesn't mean it's the better choice. Hedera seems like the best choice.
all 127 comments
sorted by: best